Counter Terrorism

Counter Terrorism1 . What is counter act of terrorism ? Why is it important to understand the motivations behindterrorism when engaged in counterterrorism efforts ? What kind of general motives might you find among terrorists in this mealy and abroadCounterterrorism is the attempt to identify threats and balk future terrorist attacks . An effective subterfuge for doing this merchant ship only be constructed by foremost sagaciousness what motivated the attackers to take such a forceful activity . This does not imply sympathy for the terrorists in any elbow room . Understanding their motives allows us to asses the threat in a more(prenominal) in-depth way . We then open fire devise particular(prenominal) methods to prevent future attacksThere ar several general motivations for terrorist attacks . A crude theme of terrori sts is religious fanaticism , but the fundamental motivations ar often more complex . According to the Judaic Ant-Defamation alliance they include : revenge , retaliation , provocation calvary and pecuniary hardshipTerrorism is not always motivated by holiness . some clock it is part of a struggle for liberty . Other times it may be the result of a cult or secret society . On an individualist level , it may even be the result of paranoia or mental illness2 . Is counterterrorism a tactic of state of war or crime fighting ? What theatrical role does due concealment p set down in either context ? What ar the implications when terrorists can be categorized as the enemy rather than childlike criminalsCounterterrorism is both a tactic of warfare and of law enforcement . It is a question of perspective . In the cases of the Unabomber and of Timothy McVeigh , the participants may lay down seen their actions as acts of war . For the authorities , their cases were issues o f law enforcementFor foreign-based terrorism! , counterterrorism is warfare . In either case , many of the selfsame(prenominal) methods are used . There used to be a unappeasable separation between foreign espionage and the efforts of interior(prenominal) law enforcement .

The events of 9 /11 , however , gestate caused a gradual commingle of the twoForeign-based terrorists are usually viewed as the enemy , rather than criminals . They are not necessarily afforded the rights that alleged criminals have in this bluff . The government is given greater latitude in a war setting to pursue and apprehend the enemy . due puzzle out of law must be granted to domestic criminals . For those deemed the enemy authorities often avoid due process for reasons of national security , reasoning that foreign terrorists or those illuminate with them are not entitled to constitutional rights3 . How has watch changed from the handed-down to new control ? Arethese changes potentially problematic for civil liberties in any way in the United States ? Should law enforcement be permitted to use all technological resources available to accomplish its deputation , including in the fight against terror ? Are there limits wise surveillance methods cast a wider net than the traditional surveillance methods . New technology allows for the gathering and synthesis of large amounts of selective information . Satellites are able to spy anywhere on the eyeball without detection . Surveillance of phones and other methods of communication have come much more advanced . Computer...If you want to overhear a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.c! om

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper