Humans and Transcendence

Viktor Frankl wrote, Dostoevsky state once, There is only atomic number 53 thing that I reverence: not to be fitting of my sufferings. These words frequently came to my thinker after I became introduce with those martyrs whose behaviors in camp, whose suffering and death, tire witness to the fact that the farthermost inner impeccantdom cannot be los. It is this spiritual freedom-which cannot be interpreted away-that makes life meaningful and businesslike (Frankl 33). When we ask, What does it mean to be gay? We atomic number 18 tossed into an historical discourse that takes the faculty of reason and the timeless search for happiness as points of departure for defining a human being.\nPhilosophers including Aristotle, Kant, and Nietzsche each address these questions, and despite their specific differences seemed to come at a confusable conclusion: that the definition of humans involves the allow for to reason. Viktor Frankl seems to meld these various propositions in to an internal expression found on internal and painstaking freedom. For Frankl, spiritual freedom itself defines a meaningful life. This includes the ability to divulge solace in the monument of the past within the front man of ungodly conditions, and an undying dogma in the power of love. in time for the purposes of this paper, a human is delimit by the ability to will someone happiness by means of the avenue of reason, in whatsoever way it manifests for each soulfulness based on their good values.\nIn Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant formulates that individual freedom can be attained done chaste law which is given everywhere to humans a priori through reason. Acting in conformation with the supreme moral dogma is freeing because it releases individuals from the causes of emotion which are not predicated on free will. By engaging with and celebrating Kants concept of ought-ness, freedom is illuminated in every instance. For our lives are not determi ned by individual or ephemeral external circumstances, ...