'Case Study: Out-Of-Town\r'

'This eluding analyse allow for see to it four part of out-of-town brown and the circumvent probation supervisor. The first is what should Casey’s response be to the reporter concerning the agency’s recommendation. The import is if Casey elects to discuss her military officer’s recommendation for some form of median(a) sanction, how mickle she justify such sanctions in general and in this case specifically. The third covers do you tactile puritanicalty that the probation officer’s recommendation based on these facts is correct, why or why non.Lastly, which form of mean(a) sanction would appear to h ancient the most stipulation for the wrongdoer in this case. Casey’s Response I would answer the phone and answer question with a level-headed brief conversation. I am standing by the decision the probation officer has recomm terminate. The mediate sanction is proper decision for a 23-twelvemonth-old hu small-arm who murdered his step f ounding father with a knife after suffering domainy long time of physical and mental abuse. The immature creation had no former immortalise and had been an incest dupe since he was 5 historic period old; he is considered an otherwise passive person, a commencement recidivism risk.However, this call that I receiving from you, a well- dwelln veteran local anaesthetic television anchorpersonâ€a strong crusader in the local war against offensive, is to deter me from agreeing with the probation officer. I recognize you receive the young man will be convictd tomorrow, just I want you to answer a few questions. Have you ever done something in your animateness where you could convey been sent to prison? Don’t answer because I know the answer. Did this young man do something against companionship? Yes, he will and has payed for his crime. fair sanctions atomic number 18 crook decrys that fall between get probation and incarceration. negociate sanctions can include house arrest, intensive probation, bam camps, electronic monitoring, and drug discussion programs. Intermediate sanctions dish up a dual purpose in the criminal justice system. The reason I am agreeing with this sentence is because liaise sanctions versus incarceration assist overcrowding and eases the burden from the prison system in the United States. Id rather mother him a chance than a nonher prisoner who has killed several(prenominal) people for no app arent reason. The young man has been dealt horrible hand in living, and I trust he can benefit from this sentencing.I think if this was your child, fellow or even you would want a second chance. It is time for someone to help this man so he can become a fecund citizen. The person without any sins shall cast the first stone. federation will sign its justice, but a man will come up another chance at life. The agency has to sort out decisions that will be in effect(p) to society and the prison system. The s entence is not allow the young man go free, but he will sever in least restrictive setting to pay for his crime. military officer’s testimony And Such SanctionsThe 23 year-old-man who murdered his stepfather, after more years of suffering mental and physical abuse, deserves an arbitrate sanction. The probation officer has taken into report the entire military position to make this recommendation. The man’s several years of constant abuse, prior criminal record, and peace fit character outside of the incident are indications that the man whitethorn not react well to existence in a prison. Intermediate sanctions are participation-based corrections that are more restrictive than probation and slight restrictive than prison (Potter, 2005).Intermediate sanctions are even so effective because it incapacitates wrongdoers enough to make committing new crimes extremely difficult, it is a deterrent to the proclivity to commit new crimes, and it protects the commun ity (Peak, 2010). There are several options to employ to ensure the community is safe, and the wrongdoer is closely monitored. Intensive supervision, home confinement, electronic monitoring, and community correction centers are all different options that would be sufficient sanctions for the man and the community.There are several benefits to using some form of mean(a) sanction for this case and future cases to come. Intermediate sanctions are cost-effective versus house an inmate in prison or an grounding (Potter, 2005). The offender has the ability to live in the community, nominate to the community, and receive support or treatment from treatment programs. By removing the prison facility from the equation, recidivism is reduced because offenders do not reserve to reintegrate back into society (Potter, 2005).Currently, this community is focused on the war on crime. The act that the 23 year-old-man committed is undoubtedly criminal. Furthermore, this subdivision is committe d to doing what is right. However, the 23 year-old-man is not the person to print retribution because he is also a victim. The arbitrate sanction is not letting the man get off easy; he will still receive supervision and most importantly treatment. The man can make a positive sham on the community through community helper and further supporting the war on crime.Probation policeman’s Recommendation I do not feel that the probation officer’s recommendation of â€Å" median(a) sanctions” is appropriate for the 23-year-old man. Although I do see that the young man was physically and mentally abused for years as he was also a victim of incest since he was five, he is still an full-grown. We also know â€Å"The young man had no prior record and had been an incest victim since he was 5 years old; he is considered an otherwise nonviolent person, a low recidivism risk” (Peak, 2010).I feel that the young man should receive jail time and not just modal(a) san ctions. If he were a 13-year-old boy intermediate sanctions whitethorn be appropriate, but seeing that he is an adult I feel that jail time as well as intensive therapy and counseling is tout ensemble infallible for him. The exclusive, although not stated, may definitely know the difference from what is right and wrong in life and he may present been able to at least get away from his father or notify the police of what his father has done to him and has been doing to him since he was a child.In some instances the various(prenominal) may founder been reliving the situations that his father had put him through and this may redeem triggered his response to kill his father; the crimes he committed are also violent in which I also believe intermediate sanctions is not appropriate for the young man. Knowing that the situation could have been handled a lot differently, the young man may not have killed his father and his father could have been the one incarcerated leaving the you ng man to try therapy and counseling for his scarring of childhood.Since the young man was the victim to his father in anterior and possibly current years, I feel that the individual should receive a sentence of voluntary manslaughter since he committed a crime without premeditation and leading to the murder he had a prior history of mitigating factors. â€Å"Mitigating factors show that the defendant poses less risk to society tha otherwise, so a protracted sentence is unnecessary. Typical mitigating factors include the lack of a criminal history and the defendant’s acceptance of responsibility for the crime” (Thomson Reuters, 2013).While the individual receives his sentencing, it is vital that he also receives intensive therapy and counseling to help him come with his actions as well as to cope with his prior history of being a victim. Having therapy and counseling can help the individual to adjust to his new milieu and also be relieved mentally of being abused as a child physically and mentally as well as being a victim to a disgusting crime of incest as a child.It is sad to say that he went from being the victim to the murderer when things could have ended up differently for him and his now deceased father. Intermediate Sanction Intermediate sanctions focus primarily on nonviolent offenders, in order to reduce the be of lengthy prison terms and to reduce the amount of individuals housed in prisons for minor offenses. In addition, some intermediate sanctions provide offenders with treatment options that the prison system is not capable of providing because of the current budget.In light of the new-made extend in the prison population, certain choice sentencing options soon exist in the criminal justice system. â€Å"Because legion(predicate) States are concerned about the fiscal ramifications of recent increases in sentence lengths for violent crimes, the combination of sentencing guidelines and intermediate sanctions has been seen as a cost-effective means to straightaway violent offenders to appropriate prison sentences and many nonviolent offenders to appropriate community sanctions” (Tonry, 1997, pg.7).In the case of the twenty-three year old man who murdered his stepfather, the intermediate sanctions alternative would normally not apply to such a case. In consideration of the current facts pertaining to budget issues inside the criminal justice system, perhaps certain exceptions are of consideration in this case taking into account the offender’s previous record. The form of intermediate sanction that would hold the most promise for the offender in this case would be thump probation/parole.Since the offender has no previous record of any affable and considered a nonviolent person, based on his previous record, and is at a low risk for reoffending, and the individual does not pose an initial threat to his community. The â€Å" impact” probation form of intermediate sanctions provides the offender, in this case, with a brief exposure to prison life over a few months (which the offender in this case will not be comfortable with in telling to his non-existing criminal record). This sanction will allow the estimate to reconsider initial sentencing and bring the offender originally the judge to determine the outcome of the sentence.The overall ideal of shock probation is to deter individuals from potential criminal doings in the future, and provide the individual with a taste, so to speak, of what is in store for the offender if he decides to affiance a criminal life-style (Peak, 2010). Under the â€Å"shock” probation sanction, individuals’ need to obtain a sponsor at heart the community who will take responsibility for the offender’s actions, while communicating directly with the probation officer. Deming the applicant as a nonviolent person, the offender should have no problem obtaining a sponsor at heart the community.The selected sp onsor is responsible for providing resources to the probation officer, such as providing transportation, compliance, and with legal standards, such as curfew and other restrictions, and to assist the individual with adequate shelter and maintain employment if necessary (Peak, 2010). Conclusion By understanding this case study it allowed for us to examine the four key parts around Casey’s response in singing to the Probation Supervisor. By evaluating all aspects of this case study we were able to identify with Casey’s point of view.When looking at any kind of response to the media, it shows you must be collective and precise in what you disclose. With the incorporation of the Probation Officer’s recommendation, intermediate sanctions are required in order for correct proceedings to be in effect. Fiscal ramifications often pose diminshing effects to the intermediate sanctions. Taking all these points of views into consideration, one will have more information to evaluate when determing interaction with the media and Probation Officers.\r\n'