Poetry Analysis- in the Station of the Metro

When we read poems, we dont exactly interpret the signifi tidy sumce of it automatically. It takes us a shot, or two, or three to fully understand the meaning of it or at least take in your own interpretation. In the poem In a Station of the Metro, written by Ezra Pound, one of the themes that ar presented is modernization. Nowadays, the pipe isnt the place where volume want to be because of its lousy appearance, the people front a little odd for others, and in other words people dont homogeneous taking it because we all have the wag that something bad will happen.In the next few paragraphs, it will explain stage by detail how certain literary components are used and mention to the theme. E trulything we read has a mood to put us in while we read whether itd be comical, depressing, or even mysterious. The poems mood is profound. Why is this poem so profound? Well for one, with notwithstanding 2 times there are only so much that we arse uncover ab issue a poem. A perf ect example to back end up the fact that this poem is profound is the title of respect.We all think that the title isnt as important as the rest of the poem and in this one it is because with discover it, nobody would be able to figure out the real meaning since no one will know what the source wrote about. For example, without the title, it can be a performer looking at the consultation waiting, looking exchangeable petals on a branch honest session there waiting for seasons to change, meaning for the performer to go up. Profound moods and modernization come unitedly because when you think about something in general, sometimes you provide discovering a new meaning to it.In the poem, we see a clear distinction that with the only two sentences there are, we are supposed to come up with our own meaning. What the author did was probably for us readers to decode our own meaning of the poem by just writing 2 sentences. Because the mood is so profound, its very relevant to mode rnization because in the modern world, we finger that metros are filled with angry people pushing, dirty floors and walls. The author is fundamentally telling us that we are still the same people just on a dirty metro, as considerably reminding us to be calm and think of ourselves as flowers on a branch.What we see and what we in reality interpret are two antithetic things. Not everything is what it seems to be. Another element used is comparisons. To compare something means to take something and make it seem like something else. In the poem, the poet describes faces in the crowd as petals on a wet, dark-skinned bough because in a crowd, its easy to pick out distinct faces because everyone is different. Everyone has a unique look and since the poet is picking out faces in a crowd, it could be a comparison to picking out petals, off a stem or a bough, one by one as if each petal was an individual face.Imagery can also be coupled with the topic of comparisons because every sent ence has a different meaning that can be linked to each other in a trend that we can imagine it. Usually a metro is hectic, nobody genuinely wants to be in it especially at rush hour, but what the poet is exhausting to do is remind us that within our environment around us are serenity and ease in ourselves that we have to think of. Petals from flowers are very delicate and the poet tells us that if its hectic on the metro or anywhere else, there is always peace to think of, like the flowers.These elements are relevant to the theme because nowadays, people tend to judge forwards they think twice. In the poem for example, if the people werent reminded that there is peace and serenity within themselves, then theyd think their society is a bad place. Is there such thing as non finger? Is a pile of nonsense put together supposed to make sense? In the poem, the last two elements presented are good line breaks and ambiguity.To be ambiguous means to be vague, and the poem really shows the vagueness in the legal line breaks. Every line in the poem is a different sentence, irrelevant to the others. The first sentence would have to be the title, In a Station of the Metro. This is an uncompleted sentence and with the others that come, it still makes no sense. The plunk for sentence is The apparition of these faces in a crowd, still an incomplete sentence because theres a verb that needs to come into breeze for it to be complete and make sense.And the last sentence of the poem is Petals on a wet, black bough this as well is an incomplete sentence just now just a description. But if everything is put together, this is where ambiguity and as well imagery comes in. The fact that everything is so vague and that after every sentence theres a break, it could subliminally mean that everything is meant to be put together like a puzzle. When the sentences are put together, it tells us that within a crowd of people on a metro, everyone is unique like petals on a bough.Eve n if something is ambiguous, there is always a way to figure out some meaning for it. This is related to modernization because like imagery, we dont perceive things for what they are right away so its very vague, then after figuring out what it could mean or be everything would make sense. To conclude, modernization has changed the way we think as the years go by, we all have different points of view now and we judge in advance we think things through.In the poem, using all the elements like mood, imagery, comparisons, ambiguity and use of effective line breaks, they all had some relevance towards the theme which was modernization. Things have changed since the preliminary years. Back then, no one judged right away, everyone was just living. Now that we have new technology and such, it makes us closed minded because technology told make us believe that the real world sucks. The poem made me go through that there is more to the world than what we can actually physically see. somet imes what we see isnt exactly what we think it is.